Models of CT Integration
Our research team conducted six case studies of New York City elementary schools as they participated in professional development (PD) programs to help educators integrate an instructional focus on computational thinking (CT) in their curricula.
Each case study used a unique approach for achieving schoolwide CT integration. Click on each item below to see the details of each case model.
Case Studies
Side by Side Snapshot of Case Models
STEAM Led | I Do, You Do, We Do | Whole School | Administrator Led | Teacher Led | Teacher PCK | |
Intervention years | 2017 – 2019 | 2018 – 2020 | 2018 – 2020 | 2019 – 2022 | 2019 – 2022 | 2019 – 2022 |
PD Focus | Teacher self-efficacy | Teacher self-efficacy | Teacher self-efficacy and implementing lessons | Teacher self-efficacy and implementing lessons | Teacher self-efficacy | Teacher self-efficacy |
Development of lessons | PD provider and STEAM teacher | PD provider and teachers | PD provider and school leaders | School leaders | PD provider and teachers | PD provider and teachers |
Content-area focus | STEAM | Math and ELA | Math and ELA | Science | Determined by individual teacher | Determined by individual teacher |
Relationship between PD and student experience | CT primarily integrated by STEAM teacher in science curriculum | Focus on teachers learning to create and facilitate lessons on their own | Whole school use of CT activities in math and ELA; implemented CT integrated math units | CT primarily integrated in specific science units across all grade levels | Focus on teachers learning to create and facilitate lessons on their own | Focus on teachers learning to create and facilitate lessons on their own |